Look L'emmy, let me explain it to you. It is quite reasonable, in every sense, for anyone to declare that their skin colour automatically marks them as superior to all others and that it duly affords them certain and particular rights, privileges and protections, including rights of dominion over others, the privilege of determining the status and life conditions of others, and protections which allow these ideals to be imposed by whatever means necessary. To demand an institution of the defacto racial, sexual, and/or political superiority of a self-selected group who, authorised by such selection, claim it a duty, placed upon both the individual and the state, to downgrade or remove the rights of those declared inferior, and to organise and agitate for such an institution, is similarly reasonable. What is not reasonable is for this underdog political position to be met with vehement opposition from the very people who's rights, privileges and protections should, by right, be downgraded or removed in favour of, and at the insistence of, the self-selecting group. For the community to vehemently oppose and round on the underdog in such a manner as to limit or stop them advocating, organising, and agitating for the institution of their ideals is fascism pure, plain and true (unless that self-selecting group are Muslims of course).
we are talking about a tiny number of incidents by a tiny minority of the left. Stop with the generalising.