The UK election thread

Post Reply
User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:31 pm

Pappa wrote:
I'm considering breaking my habit of spoiling my ballot paper for this very reason. I don't identify with the Lib Dems fully, but more so than any of the other 3 main parties. My seat is a marginal, 2005 was pretty close:

Labour 41.2
Tory 37.3
Lib Dem 13.0
Plaid 5.1
UK Independence Party 1.8
Liberal Party 1.3
Socialist Labour Party 0.3

.
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy? :think:
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
Jack Rawlinson
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Jack Rawlinson » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:35 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy? :think:
Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?

User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:37 pm

Jack Rawlinson wrote:
Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy? :think:
Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?

Just trying to make Labour look like fascists. :hehe:
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
Jack Rawlinson
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Jack Rawlinson » Fri Apr 16, 2010 7:55 pm

Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Jack Rawlinson wrote:
Deep Sea Isopod wrote:
Labour won with 41.2% of the votes? That means 58.8% didn't vote for them! And you call that democracy? :think:
Well... yeah. Because, you know, there weren't just two parties in the election, remember? You know how "majority" doesn't mean "more than 50%" in that circumstance?

Just trying to make Labour look like fascists. :hehe:

Hell, you do that by pointing to their record on civil liberties. :-)

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:23 pm

Check out the latest YouGov opinion polls, the Lib Dems have over taken Labour:

Conservative: 33%
Labour: 28%
Liberal Democrat: 30%
Others: 9%

Image
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
AshtonBlack
Tech Monkey
Tech Monkey
Posts: 7773
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by AshtonBlack » Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:25 pm

Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:41 pm

AshtonBlack wrote:Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
But you could argue that if all you're after as a politican is power then the Lib Dems aren't the best choice for attaining it, as the perception is that only Labour or the Tories can win.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
AshtonBlack
Tech Monkey
Tech Monkey
Posts: 7773
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by AshtonBlack » Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:45 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:
AshtonBlack wrote:Fucking hell.
Yes, there are policies that the Lib Dems (and I quit the party because of it) have that I do not agree with. At this stage in my life, I just want the least corrupt. Even if power corrupts them, the Lib Dems fit that bill.
But you could argue that if all you're after as a politican is power then the Lib Dems aren't the best choice for attaining it, as the perception is that only Labour or the Tories can win.
I don't think there are absolutes, I'm not naive to think that the head honcho's of the Lib Dems won't be corrupted by power. THey are just the least unpalatable to my liberal, secular, humanist philosophies and I like the idea they could shake things up a bit. (Underdog liking?)

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Thinking Aloud » Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:05 pm

+something to some posts somewhere.

My interest in politics is next to zero usually, but I'm pretty much unimpressed by the two main parties these days. Throwing a vote away is not an option for me - I may as well use it to make a point of showing support for another option. I've never understood the "my constituency has always voted X so there's no point trying to change it, even though X are a bunch of arses these days" attitude. That guarantees that nothing will ever change.

Of course, ultimately the election will be decided by what the editor of The Sun choses to print on his front page on the morning of polling day. That's usually how it works. :roll:

User avatar
AshtonBlack
Tech Monkey
Tech Monkey
Posts: 7773
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:01 pm
Location: <insert witty joke locaction here>
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by AshtonBlack » Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:27 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:+something to some posts somewhere.

My interest in politics is next to zero usually, but I'm pretty much unimpressed by the two main parties these days. Throwing a vote away is not an option for me - I may as well use it to make a point of showing support for another option. I've never understood the "my constituency has always voted X so there's no point trying to change it, even though X are a bunch of arses these days" attitude. That guarantees that nothing will ever change.

Of course, ultimately the election will be decided by what the editor of The Sun choses to print on his front page on the morning of polling day. That's usually how it works. :roll:
Won't be the lib dems then, they don't pay enough... (oh sorry did I suggest that deals for media coverage would be done?) I mean erm, something else.

10 Fuck Off
20 GOTO 10
Ashton Black wrote:"Dogma is the enemy, not religion, per se. Rationality, genuine empathy and intellectual integrity are anathema to dogma."

User avatar
Deep Sea Isopod
Bathynomus giganteus
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 1:09 am
Location: Gods blind spot.
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Deep Sea Isopod » Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:34 am

As Nick Clegg pointed out. 65 years of Tory and Labour government making the same mistakes over and over again.

I'm all for giving someone else a chance. Lib Dems are the only party within range of being a threat to the other two parties, so I'll vote for them.


Still would prefer UKIP though.
I run with scissors. It makes me feel dangerous Image

Image

User avatar
RuleBritannia
Cupid is a cunt!
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 9:55 pm
About me: About you
Location: The Machine
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by RuleBritannia » Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:24 pm

Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.

Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats

I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
RuleBritannia © MMXI

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Rum » Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:32 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.

Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats

I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
That's the 'first past the post' system for ya.

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by Thinking Aloud » Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:35 pm

RuleBritannia wrote:Found something interesting. If you take Saturday's YouGov stats and put them into the BBC's "swing-o-meter" you can get a vague idea of how many seats each party would with those percentages.

Labour 28% = 275 seats
Conservative 33% = 245 seats
Lib Dem 30% = 99 seats

I makes me think if the Soviet Union had adopted such a quasi-democratic system they'd probably still be around today.
I did that too, and was amazed how completely at odds with common sense this result seemed to be. I admit that I only had the vaguest idea how it worked before today - now I haven't a clue.

User avatar
beige
Posts: 577
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: Bristol, UK
Contact:

Re: The UK election thread

Post by beige » Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:39 pm

:ask: I knew it was bad - but that's crazy.

Edit:
Democracy! :tup:
Image
In the best laid plans of history lie the ruins of the past
And a chronicle of suffering shows the mythic pall they cast
To believe is true religion, but to see is truth at last
Oh no, too late to hold a trial, time doesn't wait for the watchmaker's dial

Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests