Celebrity Sexual Harassment Charge Sheet

[pErvinalia]

Come on Bob, I'm a commie, surely?

[Bob]

Come on Bob, I'm a commie, surely?

What?

[Sean Hayden]

You're wrong Bob. Peacock's the real deal.

[Cunt]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

Howard Stern is still loved and celebrated by the left. It isn't because he keeps toeing the line.

Of course, that could be just a conspiracy theory. Stern didn't do shocking things to naked chicks for his own entertainment. (it was for ALL of us)

[Brian Peacock]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

If it's random then it's only coincidental. See the definition of coincidence. But you're right, his former employers and associates have questions to answer and the media pearl-clutching about the allegations doesn't change that.

[Cunt]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

If it's random then it's only coincidental. See the definition of coincidence. But you're right, his former employers and associates have questions to answer and the media pearl-clutching about the allegations doesn't change that.

As long as Stern keeps toeing the line, they will keep going after other people, and pretending to have the moral high ground as they do.

[Svartalf]

What I find most amusing about Cunt's stance here is the attempt to somehow blame the left for what rich and powerful people do to others...

Caviar left SoBs have more than their share of those crimes

[Bob]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

If it's random then it's only coincidental. See the definition of coincidence. But you're right, his former employers and associates have questions to answer and the media pearl-clutching about the allegations doesn't change that.

What are you trying to prove here? What is the reason or motive for your participation?

[Brian Peacock]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

If it's random then it's only coincidental. See the definition of coincidence. But you're right, his former employers and associates have questions to answer and the media pearl-clutching about the allegations doesn't change that.

What are you trying to prove here? What is the reason or motive for your participation?

I wasn't trying to prove anything. I was just saying what I thought in response to what Cunt posted. Why do you ask? What's your motivation for posting here?

[Bob]

The world's most insipid white knight is strolling around online using the name Peacock. Swear to god, I absolutely love this place.

Brand wasn't targeted by corporate media and the UK government when he started being sexually inappropriate (if he was). It was later, at a random coincidental time.

If it's random then it's only coincidental. See the definition of coincidence. But you're right, his former employers and associates have questions to answer and the media pearl-clutching about the allegations doesn't change that.

What are you trying to prove here? What is the reason or motive for your participation?

I wasn't trying to prove anything. I was just saying what I thought in response to what Cunt posted. Why do you ask? What's your motivation for posting here?

Delving into the pasts of male feminists and white knights often turns up some rather interesting results, so naturally I am curious.

[pErvinalia]

I'd almost forgotten how rancid you are.

[Cunt]

What are you trying to prove here? What is the reason or motive for your participation?

I wasn't trying to prove anything. I was just saying what I thought in response to what Cunt posted. Why do you ask? What's your motivation for posting here?

Have they found more victims of Brand yet?

I hear that news rooms have been working hard at it. They surely can muster up more than this sad few stories. Unless they are busy, with bigger fish to fry...

[Sean Hayden]

In both cases girls spoke up. Nobody’s going to step up and say they raped kids on nightmare island.

This shit’s getting dumb.

[JimC]

So, the protection of powerful billionaires from charges of sexual misconduct is a left wing plot?

Yeah, right...

[Animavore]

Was fun watching the Russell Brand subreddit go from a small corner of Reddit with just a few of his fans to blowing up and the fans getting swamped by people wanting to talk about the allegations and their impotent backlash against the tidal wave.

Their small little echo chamber, for them, has become an anechoic chamber.