Real conspiracies

[mistermack]

???

Have you just swallowed a dictionary?

If you had trouble understanding any of the words I typed you need only ask.

Sod that it might be catching.
I was learnt to talk grammatical that does me all right.

[Brian Peacock]

Many discourses concerning the common ground between ideological cohesion and narrativity exist. The primary theme of von Ludwig’s essays on cultural communication theory address the role of the writer as reader for example, while the work of his contemporary Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural postsemioticist theory as an attack on the precepts of class hierarchy. It is clear therefore that there exists an abundance of discourses concerning both the semantic and semiotic deployment of specific, and indeed some would say necessary, paraphrasic entities used in cross-cultural information-exchange.

As Derrida was at pains to point out, lexiconographical constructivism is intrinsically responsible for all class divisions, forming, as is does, a ground distinction between the communicative intents of ideologies with disparate aspirations. Commonly, the subject is contextualised into a narrative that attempts a description of reality as a totality, and in so doing the characteristic economies of subdialectic society are exposed and made available in the form of discretely interpolated ideographical schema.

Just saying.

[pErvinalia]

[Rum]

Many discourses concerning the common ground between ideological cohesion and narrativity exist. The primary theme of von Ludwig’s essays on cultural communication theory address the role of the writer as reader for example, while the work of his contemporary Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural postsemioticist theory as an attack on the precepts of class hierarchy. It is clear therefore that there exists an abundance of discourses concerning both the semantic and semiotic deployment of specific, and indeed some would say necessary, paraphrasic entities used in cross-cultural information-exchange.

As Derrida was at pains to point out, lexiconographical constructivism is intrinsically responsible for all class divisions, forming, as is does, a ground distinction between the communicative intents of ideologies with disparate aspirations. Commonly, the subject is contextualised into a narrative that attempts a description of reality as a totality, and in so doing the characteristic economies of subdialectic society are exposed and made available in the form discretely interpolated ideographical schema.

Just saying.

thesarussaur.png (145.92 KiB) Viewed 894 times

[Brian Peacock]

[Svartalf]

[mistermack]

It might be a dictionary when you swallow it, but it's still a load of shit when it comes back out. Dan Brown must have eaten a whole library of dictionaries.

Is that what they mean by a man of letters?

[Brian Peacock]

This post was brought to you by the letters B and S.

[pErvinalia]

Many discourses concerning the common ground between ideological cohesion and narrativity exist. The primary theme of von Ludwig’s essays on cultural communication theory address the role of the writer as reader for example, while the work of his contemporary Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural postsemioticist theory as an attack on the precepts of class hierarchy. It is clear therefore that there exists an abundance of discourses concerning both the semantic and semiotic deployment of specific, and indeed some would say necessary, paraphrasic entities used in cross-cultural information-exchange.

As Derrida was at pains to point out, lexiconographical constructivism is intrinsically responsible for all class divisions, forming, as is does, a ground distinction between the communicative intents of ideologies with disparate aspirations. Commonly, the subject is contextualised into a narrative that attempts a description of reality as a totality, and in so doing the characteristic economies of subdialectic society are exposed and made available in the form discretely interpolated ideographical schema.

Just saying.

thesarussaur.png