
Misogyny to be recorded as hate crime
- laklak
- Posts: 21022
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
- Contact:
Re: Misogyny to be recorded as hate crime
Just let 'em TRY.


Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Misogyny to be recorded as hate crime
Will restaurants that don't allow dogs be guilty of a hate crime?
Or girls who don't fancy ugly men?
Or leisure parks rides that have a minimum height rule?
Or Muirfield golf club and their no women rule?
The world is so full of hate.
Or girls who don't fancy ugly men?
Or leisure parks rides that have a minimum height rule?
Or Muirfield golf club and their no women rule?
The world is so full of hate.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39989
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Misogyny to be recorded as hate crime
Hating dog is not a crime. Nor hating dog owners. Victimising dog owners is a crime, and victimising dogs may fall foul of the UK's rather scant animal cruelty regulations. There are legitimate food hygiene and safety reasons for excluding dogs in restaurants - with an exception for guide dogs, as that excludes the visually impaired from accessing services. And besides, everyone knows that a guide dog always has clean paws.mistermack wrote:Will restaurants that don't allow dogs be guilty of a hate crime?

"Table for one please. I haz clean pawz, see."
As the law stands at the moment, there is no statute or local ordinance which obliges girls, or young or old women, to find ugly men attractive - however, you never know your look.Or girls who don't fancy ugly men?

"As soon as she saw my bank statement
she realised I had a winning personality."
Again, this is a health and safety matter which attempts to mitigate the possibility of harm. Sometimes there are similar restriction based on height, size or weight. One can hardly consider this an arbitrary or discriminatory exclusion.Or leisure parks rides that have a minimum height rule?

On the other hand, this is an arbitrary and discriminatory exclusion of a portion of the population based on the possession, or lack thereof, of certain and particular physical attributes. However, a private club may order their affairs in accordance with the law in any way they see fit - so ideally the club's admission and membership policy has to be tested in law.Or Muirfield golf club and their no women rule?
Personally I wouldn't wand to be the member of a club that excluded women or blind people.
And terror. Don't forget The Terror.The world is so full of hate.

Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
Re: Misogyny to be recorded as hate crime
Actually, no, there aren't. There's no contemporary cases of anyone being made ill by a dog in a restaurant. It's a long-held false belief and bigotry and nothing more that dogs are "unsanitary" and pose a public health risk in restaurants. There's not a shred of evidence that this is true. France allows dogs in restaurants and we don't see French people dropping dead of dog-borne diseases. The biggest health risk in any restaurant isn't a dog, it's the wogs who are cooking your food who may have hepatitis and fail to wash their hands after taking a shit and the owner who doesn't keep the place clean and the food stored properly.Brian Peacock wrote:Hating dog is not a crime. Nor hating dog owners. Victimising dog owners is a crime, and victimising dogs may fall foul of the UK's rather scant animal cruelty regulations. There are legitimate food hygiene and safety reasons for excluding dogs in restaurantsmistermack wrote:Will restaurants that don't allow dogs be guilty of a hate crime?
The only real problem with dogs anywhere is the potential for dog misbehavior, but that's easily rectified if and when it happens...you simply kick the owner and the offending dog out...and you can do that even if it's a service animal if it acts up or is disruptive...under the ADA.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests