Blind groper wrote:More guns less crime only according to the fraud, John Lott.
Genuine researchers show the opposite.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013- ... #read_more
Blind groper wrote:More guns less crime only according to the fraud, John Lott.
Genuine researchers show the opposite.
Exactly the response I expected and the reason I posted it, as she describes how liberals discount anything they don't like and automatically discrediting the source so they never have to take contrary information seriously, continuing to arrogantly believe that they're always right.tattuchu wrote:Anne fucking Coulter? Jesus fuck. Collector, you may be an insane demented retarded gunnut phucktard, but even you can't be that fucking stupid as to take anything Anne Coulter says seriously![]()
![]()
Blow me, you utter and complete waste-of-DNA embarrassment-to-my-country worthless piece of fucking shit. If I were insane enough to own a gun, I'd happily shoot you in the fucking face.Collector1337 wrote:Exactly the response I expected and the reason I posted it, as she describes how liberals discount anything they don't like and automatically discrediting the source so they never have to take contrary information seriously, continuing to arrogantly believe that they're always right.tattuchu wrote:Anne fucking Coulter? Jesus fuck. Collector, you may be an insane demented retarded gunnut phucktard, but even you can't be that fucking stupid as to take anything Anne Coulter says seriously![]()
![]()
By the way, where did you attend graduate school for clinical psychology?
It hardly matters. These gun discussions are a farce. On the one hand you have insane demented head-up-their-ass cretins like Collector and Seth and artistically-brilliant-but-fucked-in-the-head retards like Gallstones. And then on the other hand you have the sane rational reasonable, oh I don't know, whole rest of the fucking membership. And ne'er the twain shall meet.Svartalf wrote:Tatt, please keep it civil or stop posting drunk. We agree that nobody sane or with a multidigit IQ should take coulter seriously, but you're not making this discussion more interesting by adding insults to it.
Wow.tattuchu wrote:Blow me, you utter and complete waste-of-DNA embarrassment-to-my-country worthless piece of fucking shit. If I were insane enough to own a gun, I'd happily shoot you in the fucking face.Collector1337 wrote:Exactly the response I expected and the reason I posted it, as she describes how liberals discount anything they don't like and automatically discrediting the source so they never have to take contrary information seriously, continuing to arrogantly believe that they're always right.tattuchu wrote:Anne fucking Coulter? Jesus fuck. Collector, you may be an insane demented retarded gunnut phucktard, but even you can't be that fucking stupid as to take anything Anne Coulter says seriously![]()
![]()
By the way, where did you attend graduate school for clinical psychology?
The personal attack has been reported and will be discussed in the mod forum.I'm glad this forum is lightly moderated, as most forums are overly moderated. But, hasn't a line been crossed when there's death threats involved?
I don't just "believe" gun ownership increases my survival, I KNOW it increases my survival as I'd be dead otherwise.Blind groper wrote:To Collector,
Who believes his gun ownership increases survival.
Sorry mate. The stats show that homes with a gun present have a higher rate of fatal shootings. Owning a gun reduces your survival chances, though admittedly by only a small degree.
Living in a country with very few hand guns, increases chances of survival a lot more.
My country has an average lifespan of 81, compared to yours of only 79.
I didn't say it.tattuchu wrote:Jesus fuck. Collector, you may be an insane demented retarded gunnut phucktard![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests