The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post Reply
User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Geoff » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:13 am

Gawdzilla wrote:Looks like nobody has a clue Kevin.

Here's another one:

Which American had his portrait installed in the Nazi Party Headquarters in Munich by order of Adolf Hitler himself?
Henry Ford?
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:52 am

Geoff wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Looks like nobody has a clue Kevin.

Here's another one:

Which American had his portrait installed in the Nazi Party Headquarters in Munich by order of Adolf Hitler himself?
Henry Ford?
Ayep. His support of what became The International Jew (Collected works from his Dearborn paper) impressed Hitler very much. Ford also hired Charles Lindburgh during the war, when nobody else would touch him because of his pre-war isolationist and pro-Nazi position. Ford later recanted his position.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by klr » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:05 pm

Gawdzilla wrote:
Geoff wrote:
Gawdzilla wrote:Looks like nobody has a clue Kevin.

Here's another one:

Which American had his portrait installed in the Nazi Party Headquarters in Munich by order of Adolf Hitler himself?
Henry Ford?
Ayep. His support of what became The International Jew (Collected works from his Dearborn paper) impressed Hitler very much. Ford also hired Charles Lindburgh during the war, when nobody else would touch him because of his pre-war isolationist and pro-Nazi position. Ford later recanted his position.
Oddly enough, I had a strong suspicion it was Ford the moment I saw the question, but I said "Na, that's too obvious". :doh:

Geoff has has the dubious honour of setting the next question. :twisted:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Geoff » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:28 pm

Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:33 pm

Geoff wrote:Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
The Royal Marines weren't gay enough?
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:43 pm

Geoff wrote:Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
Are you referring to Holman Projectors?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Geoff » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:45 pm

leo-rcc wrote:
Geoff wrote:Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
Are you referring to Holman Projectors?
Nope. :mrgreen: These were actual road drills.
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:47 pm

Geoff wrote:
leo-rcc wrote:
Geoff wrote:Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
Are you referring to Holman Projectors?
Nope. :mrgreen: These were actual road drills.
When the first German acoustic mine appeared in 1940, the Sweeping Division of HMS Vernon's Mine Design Department responded with the Sweep Acoustic (SA) hammer box. This contained a 'Kango' pneumatic road drill or an electrically driven riveting hammer striking a 7/16 inch thick 19 inch diameter steel diaphragm but the pneumatic hammers proved more reliable than the electric type. The 'A Mark 1' hammer box was fitted in the flooded bow compartment of converted trawlers but later versions were deployed on a boom over the bow. By 1942, the hammer box was common in a variety of minesweepers and sometimes towed abeam with the LL magnetic sweep. Later in the war, the Oropesa Mk 1 mechanical sweep was augmented by the lighter Oropesa Mk 2 which could be towed by small craft such as motor launches (MLs) or converted Landing Craft. This shallow water sweep, based on a German design, came into its own during the defence of Malta, the Normandy invasion and later in the Scheldt estuary.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Geoff » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:50 pm

leo-rcc wrote:
Geoff wrote:
leo-rcc wrote:
Geoff wrote:Why did some Royal Navy ships carry pneumatic road drills? :dono:
Are you referring to Holman Projectors?
Nope. :mrgreen: These were actual road drills.
When the first German acoustic mine appeared in 1940, the Sweeping Division of HMS Vernon's Mine Design Department responded with the Sweep Acoustic (SA) hammer box. This contained a 'Kango' pneumatic road drill or an electrically driven riveting hammer striking a 7/16 inch thick 19 inch diameter steel diaphragm but the pneumatic hammers proved more reliable than the electric type. The 'A Mark 1' hammer box was fitted in the flooded bow compartment of converted trawlers but later versions were deployed on a boom over the bow. By 1942, the hammer box was common in a variety of minesweepers and sometimes towed abeam with the LL magnetic sweep. Later in the war, the Oropesa Mk 1 mechanical sweep was augmented by the lighter Oropesa Mk 2 which could be towed by small craft such as motor launches (MLs) or converted Landing Craft. This shallow water sweep, based on a German design, came into its own during the defence of Malta, the Normandy invasion and later in the Scheldt estuary.
Well done! :tup: Your turn!
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:59 pm

Which other company was involved in making the M1 Carbine besides General Motors and Winchester?
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
Geoff
Pouncer
Posts: 9374
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:39 pm
Location: Wigan, UK
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by Geoff » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:07 pm

leo-rcc wrote:Which other company was involved in making the M1 Carbine besides General Motors and Winchester?
IBM
Image
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can :pawiz: . And then when they come back, they can :pawiz: again." - Tigger

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:09 pm

The floor is yours Geoff. :tup:
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by klr » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:10 pm

leo-rcc wrote:Which other company was involved in making the M1 Carbine besides General Motors and Winchester?
According to wiki, quite a few:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_carbine
...
A total of 6 million M1 carbines of various models were manufactured, making it the most produced small arm in American military history. Despite being designed by Winchester, the great majority of these were made by other companies. The largest producer was the Inland division of General Motors, but many others were made by contractors as diverse as IBM, the Underwood typewriter company, and the Rock-Ola jukebox company. Irwin-Pedersen models were the fewest produced, at a little over 4,000. Many carbines were refurbished at several arsenals after the war, with many parts interchanged from original maker carbines. True untouched war production carbines, therefore, are the most desireable for collectors.[
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
leo-rcc
Robo-Warrior
Posts: 7848
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:09 pm
About me: Combat robot builder
Location: Hoogvliet-Rotterdam, Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by leo-rcc » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:13 pm

klr wrote:
leo-rcc wrote:Which other company was involved in making the M1 Carbine besides General Motors and Winchester?
According to wiki, quite a few:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_carbine
...
A total of 6 million M1 carbines of various models were manufactured, making it the most produced small arm in American military history. Despite being designed by Winchester, the great majority of these were made by other companies. The largest producer was the Inland division of General Motors, but many others were made by contractors as diverse as IBM, the Underwood typewriter company, and the Rock-Ola jukebox company. Irwin-Pedersen models were the fewest produced, at a little over 4,000. Many carbines were refurbished at several arsenals after the war, with many parts interchanged from original maker carbines. True untouched war production carbines, therefore, are the most desireable for collectors.[
IBM was the one I knew, I didn't bother to look up if there were any others. Sorry.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
My combat robot site: http://www.team-rcc.org
My other favorite atheist forum: http://www.atheistforums.org

Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: The Google-friendly History Question Thread.

Post by klr » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:23 pm

leo-rcc wrote:
klr wrote:
leo-rcc wrote:Which other company was involved in making the M1 Carbine besides General Motors and Winchester?
According to wiki, quite a few:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_carbine
...
A total of 6 million M1 carbines of various models were manufactured, making it the most produced small arm in American military history. Despite being designed by Winchester, the great majority of these were made by other companies. The largest producer was the Inland division of General Motors, but many others were made by contractors as diverse as IBM, the Underwood typewriter company, and the Rock-Ola jukebox company. Irwin-Pedersen models were the fewest produced, at a little over 4,000. Many carbines were refurbished at several arsenals after the war, with many parts interchanged from original maker carbines. True untouched war production carbines, therefore, are the most desireable for collectors.[
IBM was the one I knew, I didn't bother to look up if there were any others. Sorry.
8-) No problem.

Now for something marginally more difficult: What was probably the most dangerous job in the Soviet Air Force in WW II?
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests